AI GTM research API

GTM research your system can call.

Huntr runs AI-powered research for go-to-market workflows: company context, lead research, buying signals, CRM notes, and outbound prep. Use it when your workflow needs a researched answer, not just raw search results.

Category
The GTM Research API
Inputs
Companies, domains, people, prompts, and workflows
Outputs
Research briefs, signals, notes, angles, and structured fields
Fit
Outbound, CRM, RevOps, agency, and internal AI workflows

Why GTM teams need a research API

Most GTM stacks already have databases, sequencers, CRMs, and automation tools. The missing layer is judgment-oriented research: the part where someone checks what the account does, why it matters now, what signal is real, and how that context should change the next action.

LayerWhat it gives youWhat is still missing
Data providerKnown fields and enrichmentInterpretation and sales relevance
CRMRecords, ownership, pipeline stateExternal account context
SequencerCampaign executionResearch before enrollment
HuntrPrompt-based research outputYour workflow decides how to use it

One endpoint, many GTM questions

POST /researchGTM research prompt
curl https://api.tryhuntr.com/research \
  -H "x-api-key: hntr_YOUR_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "tier": "standard",
    "prompt": "Research Figma for GTM planning. Return company context, recent signals, likely buyer priorities, and recommended outbound angles."
  }'

What your GTM workflow receives

Company context

What the company does, who it serves, how it positions itself, and what may matter to a seller, operator, or internal agent.

Lead context

Role-level research that explains why a specific person may care about a workflow, problem, or buying motion.

Buying signals

Recent public context such as launches, hiring, expansion, funding, partnerships, or other signals worth reviewing.

Decision support

Concise notes, risk flags, fit evidence, outbound angles, and CRM-ready summaries for human or system review.

Representative output modes

GTM briefExample shape
{
  "account_context": "What the company does and why it may fit the workflow.",
  "lead_context": "Why this role may care and what responsibilities are likely relevant.",
  "signals": ["public signal with business relevance", "another signal worth human review"],
  "recommended_action": "Enroll, review manually, enrich further, or skip.",
  "message_angle": "A concise angle grounded in the research.",
  "risk_notes": "What should not be claimed without confirmation."
}

Where it belongs in the GTM stack

Outbound systems

Run research before a lead enters Aimfox, Smartlead, Instantly, Apollo, or a custom sequence builder.

CRM and RevOps workflows

Write account notes, qualification context, and buyer signals into CRM fields, review queues, or routing logic.

Agency operations

Standardize research across clients so campaign teams do not rebuild the same manual process every launch.

Internal AI agents

Give assistants and automation tools a research endpoint they can call when they need external GTM context.

Prompt library

Account brief
Research this account for outbound. Return what they do, likely priorities, recent signals, objections, and relevant outreach angles.
Lead research
Research this person and company. Explain their role, likely responsibilities, and why our workflow may be relevant to them.
Buying signal review
Find recent public signals that suggest this account may be investing in sales, data, automation, hiring, or market expansion.
CRM note
Create a compact CRM research note with business summary, decision context, recent signals, recommended action, and risk notes.
Agent tool call
Given this account and workflow, return the external context an internal AI assistant needs before recommending the next action.

When not to use an AI GTM research API

Raw search results are enough

If the workflow only needs links or snippets, use a search API. Huntr is for synthesized research output.

You need deterministic fixed fields only

If every output is a fixed known attribute, direct enrichment endpoints may be cleaner than an open-ended research prompt.

No human or system review exists

Research can guide action, but high-stakes outbound claims, qualification decisions, and strategic conclusions should still be reviewable.

The workflow belongs in a spreadsheet

If the team wants the entire process in a table UI, use the tool that best owns that interface. Huntr is strongest when research must flow into an existing system.

FAQ

Is Huntr for enrichment or research?

Both can appear in the workflow, but the core value is research: interpreting company, lead, and signal context for a GTM decision.

Can this power internal GTM agents?

Yes. Use Huntr when an assistant needs external account context before recommending an action or producing a workflow note.

Can agencies use this across clients?

Yes. Agencies can standardize the research step while keeping campaign delivery in their existing tools and reporting systems.

Stop stitching together GTM data providers. Give every workflow the account context, enrichment, contacts, and signals it needs.
Get API Key →